[titan9]

What I want to know is why the hell "rockstars" like Weiland don't get criticized more often for their constant problems with breaking the law, while Stapp does a few things and gets a ton of criticism. I am not saying that it is acceptable behavior, because it is not, but rather that there is a double standard that really isn't fair. If you come down hard on Stapp, come down hard on Weiland, too. I have a feeling this has a lot to do with Stapp's Christianity, as it seems like society comes down harder on the fallen Christian than on the fallen non-believer. There should not be a double standard based on one's religion.

Stapp is no angel. He's screwed up a LOT. But compare him to a guy like Weiland and, really, there's no comparison.