[DekWannaBFlea]

Quote: (Originally Posted by Mulletman)

The reason we dont have to and the reason North Korea wont do anything is, accroding to the UN, if North Korea does any Nuclear testing - it is China's, South Korea, Japan, and Russia's obligation to strike him back. Even if his nuclear tests were dont on his own land, it is thier obligation to strike him back with the same nuclear weapons.

That doesn't matter, we have an obligation to to SK and Japan to defend them if NK goes after em. That means if they invade SK, we nuke them. Hard to face the facts but thats true.

That has got to be one of the stupidest argument i've heard of yet. To make things worse, no one can provide evidence to back that up.

Ummmmmmmm he could have vetoe bills that overspent......its not stupid, even after the Iraq war he hasn't addressed it (neither has congress) If you call your self a convervative, you would argree that W has increased government spending soooo much.....

There is nothing new with the Patriot Act, that Washington hasnt seen before. For the uninitiated... everything in the contents of the Patriot Act has been introduced into both houses of Congress by the FBI in the past. The FBI has requested these specific rights and at one point or another they were either shot down or edited. In reality YES the FBI does need the Patriot Act. The problem with that is that when the FBI requested those rights, it was during a time in which it needed them and it only requested a select few at a time. So those that question what is the deal about the Patriot Act, the big deal is that it has now recieved everything is has requested in the past -- just this time all at once.

....So he introduced it to congress and wanted it passed, and why the patriot act is bad....

1)gives to much power to exec branch
2) parts may ruled unconsitutional next year