View Single Post
Old 12-15-2005, 04:43 PM   #17
Vliegs
USER INFO »
Status: Silence Speaks
Posts: 73
Joined: Dec 2005
Currently: Offline
Re: Entertainment Weekly Review...

Pulling a few excerpts from the definition link for reasonable arguing purposes.

"ambitious, eclectic, and often grandiose style of rock music which arose in the late 1960s principally in England, reaching the peak of its popularity in the early 1970s, but continuing as a musical form to this day. Progressive rock was largely a European movement, and drew most of its influences from classical music and jazz fusion,"

I haven't heard Stapp EVER claim classical or jazz artists as his influences, but again there could be that ONE interview out there that says he took inspiration from Chopin and Fats Domino.

"Progressive rock artists sought to move away from the limitations of radio formatted rock and pop, and "progress" rock to the point that it could achieve the sophistication of jazz or classical music. It is admired by its fans for its complexity, requiring a high level of musical virtuosity to perform."

Complexity and virtuousity are not synonymous to Stapp's writing style. The thundering part mentioned in the review is true b/c he's constantly using his "sexy" growl to try inflecting more meaning than there actually is into his lyrics.

"Long compositions, sometimes running over 20 minutes, with intricate melodies and harmonies that require repeated listening to grasp. These are often described as epics and are the genre's clearest nod to classical music."

Again....clearly not Scott's style. Not saying that he has to have that style at all. Just pointing out the differences between what prog rock really is and Scott's music.
Reply With Quote