CreedFeed Community - View Single Post - Homosexuality Is Result Of Genes, Brain Structure, Hormones, Contradicts fundies.....

SecretWeapon · 03-30-2006, 07:49 PM

Quote: (Originally Posted by Lunar Shadow) the distinction of micro and macroevolution is spliting hairs if one is possible the other must be possible. tell me what happens when you have a bunch of microevolution events happen over a long period of time? answer MACROEVOLUTION!

It would seem to me that you are unaware of the difference between
micro and macro evolution. Also, I did not say that it was (even) probable
for microevolution- I said possible. I does seem outlandish to say that
all life on Earth today is because not just one, but several several instances
of macroevolution, which are, in many cases, hopelessly improbable happened.
It gets to a point where the idea of a Creator is not more extreme than
the idea that there was no creator.

Quote: do show a reference about this selective breeding you speak of I would be interested in reading it.

I'm suprised you've never heard about this, it's an arguement I've heard
time and again, or maybe you are guilty of what evolutionists accuse
creationist of - not listening to the other side's arguement.

http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/09nsel05.htm
I used a 'fundie' site again because it was the quickest place I could think
to go to post here, but I first read about this in a book somewhere, I believe. It's not a rare topic among creationists, I'm surprised you aren't familiar with it.

03-30-2006, 07:49 PM	#57
SecretWeapon USER INFO » Status: Misconception Posts: 125 Joined: Oct 2005 Currently: Offline	Re: Homosexuality Is Result Of Genes, Brain Structure, Hormones, Contradicts fundies. Quote: (Originally Posted by Lunar Shadow) the distinction of micro and macroevolution is spliting hairs if one is possible the other must be possible. tell me what happens when you have a bunch of microevolution events happen over a long period of time? answer MACROEVOLUTION! It would seem to me that you are unaware of the difference between micro and macro evolution. Also, I did not say that it was (even) probable for microevolution- I said possible. I does seem outlandish to say that all life on Earth today is because not just one, but several several instances of macroevolution, which are, in many cases, hopelessly improbable happened. It gets to a point where the idea of a Creator is not more extreme than the idea that there was no creator. Quote: do show a reference about this selective breeding you speak of I would be interested in reading it. I'm suprised you've never heard about this, it's an arguement I've heard time and again, or maybe you are guilty of what evolutionists accuse creationist of - not listening to the other side's arguement. http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/09nsel05.htm I used a 'fundie' site again because it was the quickest place I could think to go to post here, but I first read about this in a book somewhere, I believe. It's not a rare topic among creationists, I'm surprised you aren't familiar with it.