[SecretWeapon]

Evolution is a pretty vague word, it basically means a slow change over a long
period of time. However, usually when people refer to evolutionary theory,
they are implying that all life came about from non-life by a series of
hopelessly improbable "happenings" (which are statistically impossible) and
then life has been slowly bettering itself over the past several million years,
(which has never been proven to be possible) and mutations have created
different species (which has been proven impossible).

Microevolution? Perhaps. Macroevolution? Not possible.

As for proof, if you're refering to the observations made in
Peppermoths and Galapigos Finches were examples of selective
breeding, the more probable to survive (dark) moths
did survive, just as the more probable to survive finches
(the 'bigger beaked') did survive. Finches did not mutate bigger beaks,
they already had them, the moths did not make themselves darker, they were already dark.


Back on subject, yes I do act in faith, I am a Christian. I thought that you knew what the word 'faith' meant. Of course I have faith in the Bible.
All I said was that the Bible says it's a sin. I do believe it to be a
choice, thus my arguing. I have heard stories of homosexuals becoming christians, and then becoming heterosexual again.

You could say that they are just lying out of guilt, but 1) you are
accusing someone you don't even know of being a hypocrite and
2) I could say that there are open homosexuals who are just lying,
because they believe it is not by choice and they want everyone to
believe it their way, even if it means lying about they're sexuality.

Neither of our arguements would have more credibility than the other,
as it is impossible to determine (for sure) who is or is not lying.

According to you, it is all natural, there is no choice. If that is so,
than we should be able to take one homosexual man and one
heterosexual man (in a double blind test) and take them and
get MRIs of them, and then it could be shown, visualy, who is
homosexual and who is not.

You could point out the brain structure which belies homosexuality?
You could run a urine sample and tell me which is gay and which is strait?
You could from a blood sample prove to me that I am gay or not gay?

Because that is what you are saying if it is a result of brian structure,
hormones, and genes.

Also, if it was not choice, why don't we see it (as evolutionary theory
says we should) in every single species and sub-species of animal on the
planet?

And don't bring up that one type of goat, because that proves nothing.

We should see
Gay dogs
gay cats
gay hampsters
gay alligators
gay chimpanzees
gay trout
gay rhinocerous
gay girrafes
gay snakes
gay eagles
gay blubirds
gay octopus
gay ostriches
etc
etc
etc