[Ana4Stapp]

Quote: (Originally Posted by eusebioCBR)

YES, the satellite images presented by the defence department and shown on all the network news shows covering the near year long debate of wether we should hold Saddam accountable to the countless violations of the armistice he agreed to. Saddams surrender was conditional and he is responsible for those violations. If you think Saddam was no big deal or not much of a threat would you want him neighboring your country? Perhaps you'd like him heading your government? I'm sure we're all content to philosophize from our relatively comfy societies and now most in Iraq can boast that liberty(philosophize) as well.

Its getting a liitle bit boring to us - the 'liberals' to be interpreted like Saddams or Osama's fans by you americans (not all of you, of course!) here...
We dont admire them!!!!!...but the fact is that we also see the two sides of the story and honestly theres no innocence or only good intentions in invading Iraq ...
And before someone asks to some proof -- I can say that superpowers like US never were worried to show some proof --always decided to 'act' based in its suppositions in keep its mission: SAVE THE WORLD!!!!!!!!