[uncertaindrumer]

Quote: (Originally Posted by Lunar Shadow)

you misunderstood the use value... hmmmmm lest see you have value for something you worked for like say your paycheck so if some one tried to steal it from you you would fight to keep it it has more value than just a dollar to you because you worked for it. now if you put up some sort of fight for it you will probably win because the fact that the one trying to steal it doen't value your paycheck as much as you do for the one fact that he didn't work for it.

look at value this way see if this makes more sense to you.

No I figured that was what you meant. So I ask you a few things;

A) Who decides what is more valuable?

B) Where did we even get the sense of value anyway?

C) How does this lead to morals, since a sense of value would very well look at what is important to US, not other people.

I dunno. I am simply not getting why this makes the unworkability of a moral law with a moral judge somehow workable.