CreedFeed Community

CreedFeed Community (http://www.creedfeed.com/community/index.php)
-   Chat-O-Rama (http://www.creedfeed.com/community/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Clinton vs. Bush (http://www.creedfeed.com/community/showthread.php?t=5830)

Higher_Desire 02-12-2004 01:14 AM

Clinton vs. Bush
 
You know it is easy to forget the 'promises' that Bill and Hillary made while in office. It strikes home when it is listed like this:

After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured 1000; President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

BUSH COVERED IT!

After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

BUSH COVERED IT!

After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

BUSH COVERED IT!

After the 1998 bombing of U.S embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

BUSH COVERED IT!

After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. sailors; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

BUSH COVERED IT!

Maybe if Clinton had kept his promise, an estimated 3,000 people in New York and Washington, D.C. that are now dead would be alive today.

BUSH TOLD THOSE FIREMAN -- THEY WOULD HEAR US TOO!

And, now that Bush is taking action to bring these people to justice, we have Democrats charging him with being a war monger...

AN INTERESTING QUESTION: This question was raised on a Philly radio call-in show. Without casting stones, it is a legitimate question. There are two men, both extremely wealthy. One develops relatively cheap software and gives billions of dollars to charity. The other sponsors terrorism. That being the case, why was it that the Clinton administration spent more money chasing down Bill Gates over the past eight years than Osama bin Laden?

THINK ABOUT IT!

It is a strange turn of events. Hillary gets $8 Million for her forthcoming memoir. Bill gets about $12 Million for his memoir yet to be written. This from two people who have spent the past 8 years being unable to recall anything about past events while under oath!

We don't want this woman to even THINK of running for President.


H-D :razz:

creedsister 02-12-2004 01:22 AM

i really dont vote on these things b/c i know rite were its all going~~

The Lithium 02-12-2004 04:01 AM

No more Bush-shit!!!

Lechium 02-12-2004 05:16 AM

So whats your point?

Bush is hasty to go to war, and attack bunch of small countries around the world? If bully backed up by nukes is what you're looking for in president, than by all means....

JulieCitySlicker 02-12-2004 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by extreme_LITHIUM
No more Bush-shit!!!



Why the hell does it matter to you :confused: Your not even a US citizen :rolleyes:

american_bad_a$ 02-12-2004 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lechium
So whats your point?

Bush is hasty to go to war, and attack bunch of small countries around the world? If bully backed up by nukes is what you're looking for in president, than by all means....


Bush - hasty to go to war? May I remind you that he went through ALL the proper channels before we invaded Iraq. But the things is, he didn't have to!! Clinton didn't get UN approval when he invaded Bosnia. I am not saying he had to. But when liberals and democrats say that Bush should have gotten UN approval before he entered Iraq (which he did), they should remember that their "beloved president Clinton" did nothing.

Bush is not war hungry. He waited a long time. You saying that he is hasty to go to war is a bunch of bullsh*t.

You have a good day! (fag)

Mulletman 02-12-2004 03:16 PM

...sigh.....

american_bad_a$ 02-12-2004 03:36 PM

hahaha

RMadd 02-12-2004 03:39 PM

Good stuff, Colin and Al. I'm sick of people basing their opinion of how Clinton was far superior to Bush solely on the performance of the economy during their terms in office.

american_bad_a$ 02-12-2004 03:53 PM

damn skippy.

(Damn right)

JulieCitySlicker 02-12-2004 03:56 PM

I've been without a job cuz of the bad economy and I still support Bush ;)

american_bad_a$ 02-12-2004 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JulieLovesCreed
I've been without a job cuz of the bad economy and I still support Bush ;)


:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

Shadow 02-12-2004 05:13 PM

Bush - all the way.

Think about how scary it would have been after 9/11, if we didn't have Bush and it was Gore that was President (I shutter to think what Gore might have done).

Mu husband is an Air Traffic Controller. During his term, Clinton was very, very generous to them. At the other extreme, Bush wanted to cut their salaries. But I still have to go with Bush. And there couldn't be a nicer First Lady in Laura Bush. Hillary Clinton is just so damn annoying!

RMadd 02-12-2004 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadow
And there couldn't be a nicer First Lady in Laura Bush. Hillary Clinton is just so damn annoying!

True dat.

JulieCitySlicker 02-12-2004 05:26 PM

Not to mention, Hilary is also fugly as heck :wtf:

Talk about hittin the ugly tree :D


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2004 Steve Caponetto. All Rights Reserved.