CreedFeed Community |
8. When Donald Duck gets out of the shower, he puts a towel around his waist, but he never wears any pants. Why?
9. Why is it that when Bruce Banner turns into the Incredible Hulk, he gets huge and his shirt rips off, but his pants don't? 10. How far is up? 11. It is possible to be overwhelmed, and it is possible to be underwhelmed, but can you ever just be whelmed? 12. Why are there Interstates in Hawaii? 13. What is the point of Thanksgiving? The pilgrims and Indians didn't even celebrate it. They just ate together once. 14. If life evolved from a single-celled organism, where did that organism come from? 15a. Why do so many people think that Mormons in the 1800s were the only people that practiced polygimy? 15b. Why do so many people think that Mormons still practice polygimy? 15c. Why do so many people not know that polygimy was never a Mormon practice/commandment? 16. Who was the first person to say "Let's squeeze that thing under the cow and drink what comes out."? 17. If a cow laughs, will milk come out of it's nose? 18. Why doesn't anyone ever post in threads I create on this board? 19. Is the chihuahua really a dog? H-D :pimp: |
8. When Donald Duck gets out of the shower, he puts a towel around his waist, but he never wears any pants. Why?
To dry himself off, du 9. Why is it that when Bruce Banner turns into the Incredible Hulk, he gets huge and his shirt rips off, but his pants don't? The movie is rated PG-13, not XXX 10. How far is up? As far as you want it to be 11. It is possible to be overwhelmed, and it is possible to be underwhelmed, but can you ever just be whelmed? Yes 12. Why are there Interstates in Hawaii? Because I said so 13. What is the point of Thanksgiving? The pilgrims and Indians didn't even celebrate it. They just ate together once. Cheap holiday excuse to get off work 14. If life evolved from a single-celled organism, where did that organism come from? Nobody knows, but they have theorys of the suns nuclear radiation + Water and oils. 15a. Why do so many people think that Mormons in the 1800s were the only people that practiced polygimy? Because there stupid 15b. Why do so many people think that Mormons still practice polygimy? Referr to Answer a 15c. Why do so many people not know that polygimy was never a Mormon practice/commandment? Referr to answer a 16. Who was the first person to say "Let's squeeze that thing under the cow and drink what comes out."? Well considering the baby calfs drink it to live and every mammal baby drinks it as a baby, it cant really be bad for you 17. If a cow laughs, will milk come out of it's nose? No 18. Why doesn't anyone ever post in threads I create on this board? Because your not me 19. Is the chihuahua really a dog? No its a German secret weapon, half dog half rat super smart animal that serveys the area and sends them valuable information YOU QUESTIONS ARE TO EAZY FOR ME |
Quote:
8. good question and what is he covering up? he doesn't have man parts! :) 9.maybe bruce banner doesn't have any man parts either 10.i'm not sure 11.no 12.good question, silly people eating too many coconuts instead of naming their roads with proper names. 13.to give thanks for what we have? 14.whole other thread but its because macro-evolution is the biggest fraud to ever hit the scientific community. 15a.who else was doing it? as far as i know the mormons are the only christian sect who believe we become gods and that jesus and satan were once brothers, and that dark people come from the third of angels who didn't fight valiantly enough. 15b.i don't believe its still practised but i'm convinced it would be if it was legal. after all what man wouldn't have more than one if he could hehe. 15c.it was never practised? i'm not convinced..... 16. a new zealander! *wink to hayley* 17.yes....yes it will 18.not sure 19.yes but because a cat can beat it up, its on very thin ice! :) |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
H-D :pimp: |
Quote:
this is not the faith and religion section but i'm happy to have a friendly debate on the subject. joseph smith had 40 wives whilst brigham young had 60 wives. so the founder and great prophet of this religion had between them 100 wives! no where in the scriptures does it state or even hint that jesus and satan were somehow biologically linked or via some quasi-spirtual state. it saids that satan or lucifer was the highest of the archangels and he led a rebellion and a third of the angels went with him. no where is there a 3rd class and that third class become black people is downright racist. there is really no-one such as races according to biologists and many "black" people would be closer to genetically to me than my white "cousins". it simply doesn't stand up to the scientific evidence availiable to us in modern science. yes its true that concubines were a common occurence particulary with men like solomon but it was never a commandment and in fact it goes directly against "one man and one woman" like you stated from adam and eve. this mormon theology then goes directly against scripture. talking about scripture mormonism i understand teaches that scriptures were lost and changed and joseph smith was to reverse this and teach truth. the only problem here is that we have new testament manuscripts from the 2nd century A.D and old testament writings from very early on and its clear that changes were not made, at least those affecting doctrine. another problem i have with mormonism is that in the book of abraham joseph smith apparently interpreted some egyptian hierogryphics (sp) and stated it was to do with abraham. this was all well and good until modern archologists and anthropologists can state categorically that these describe embalming procedures and i believe joseph smith was a false prophet. we all have our beliefs and you're unlikely to change because of what i've stated here but i believe christianity is the one true religion and fits the evidence best, whilst mormonism has big gaping holes in theology, science and the like. anyhow good talking to ya......:) |
poor jospeh dude was a little mixed up, I Mean After Having 40 Or So Wives That Would Mess Anybody Up,,,,HAAAAAAAAAAAAA No I,ve Read The Book..And I Find A Lot Of Truth In It And Then I Find Falsehood...AND THE TRUTH THE WAY AND THE LIGHT..Will Always Pour it out Mix It All Up And Show You The Truth,
|
Quote:
What's your point? Quote:
Quote:
Quite a lot of Mayan art shows dark and light skinned peoples. The Bureau of American Ethnology calls this "wearing the skins of one's enemy," and dismisses it as as religious ceremony without explaining where the dark skins came from in the first place! On the north coast of Peru, from 400-1000 AD, a culture called the Moche or Mochica flourished. According to modern archeologists, the Moche painted thier bodies black before going into battle. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
H-D :pimp: |
Quote:
if you have enough of this discussion say so, but i'm willing to keep at this because i honestly believe there is error here. when the scriptures say we are children of the ruler of this world (ie satan) its not biologically but in a spirtual sense until/if that person is saved via grace through faith. There is simply NOTHING in the bible which points to Jesus and Satan being brothers (or Jesus having one plan for salvation and Satan other in fact there was no need for human salavation until Satan came along) and the whole premise of this belief stands and falls with Jospeh Smith. Would you agree that if Joseph Smith is shown to be a false prophet the whole religion falls? The colour of people's skin has nothing to do with what angels they came from. A simple genetics course will tell you its all genetics and so this doesn't stand up to the very simple laws of science. If this theory (not a theory in the scientific sense) were true you would expect great differences in the races but no such divisions exist as I stated earlier. It is historical fact that Joseph Smith was killed by gunfire after trying to escape after being imprisioned for polygamy (what happened to obeying the laws of caesar?). If he was so sure of his eternal fate why would he be willing to shoot others to stay alive? Look at Paul for example who had no fear of death whatsoever, same deal with all of the other 12 apostles after Christ's ascension. We know exactly what the texts say from their orignal languages of Aramaic, Hebrew and Greek because we can translate them. They were not changed (at least not affecting doctrine there were words here and there) and so Smith was just plainly wrong. Same deal with the Book of Abraham and the Egyptian illustrations, we know he was wrong. You are right in that God will judge us all but I was fairly sure Mormons would not few other "christians" as christians if you get what i'm saying. Most evanglicals would not view the Church of Christ and Later Day Saints as a true church. Anyhow good talking to ya......:) |
Quote:
Also, I also don't mind keeping the discussion open so long as it is done in a respectful manner, and doesn't turn into finger pointing, he-said/she-said, there's no chance for you, yadda yadda yadda that's happened in the past. Quote:
Also, it must be LIGITAMENT proof against him. Not one or two half points that are not part of the big picture. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
H-D :pimp: |
This is a massive case of
too long didnt read |
higher desire i'm open to keep this going and i won't start the finger pointing. what this boils down to me is that jospeh smith stated that the true message was lost through the ages and the corruption of the church perhaps in the medieval period. the problem here is that this is plainly false because we have the ancient texts and we can prove they were not changed at least to any degree worth worrying about.
if joseph translated from a language other than those three and its a language that we can't translate fully (like we can for those three) then how is anyone supposed to make sure it says what joseph said it says? the golden tablets apparently came and gone so we can't check those. with the christian bible we can check all of those writings and other texts that are not believed to be inspiried that are mentioned in the new testament by paul for example. if you look at charecters like paul and peter (well peter after christ's ascension) you will see zero fear of death and they never hid from anyone and john the baptist you may remember called the religious leaders a "brood of vipers" and pointed out herod's adultery and was killed for it. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Look, remember that we're talking here about three very different times. Around 35 A.D. (after Christ's death), 1800s A.D. (Joseph Smith's time) and 2000s A.D. (our time). Things aren't going to be exactly the same all the way throughout; word-for-word, letter-for-letter, number-for-number. If it was the same, we'd be living in a cave somewhere still amazed with these wonderful new inventions of fire and wheels. God changes things. His laws change. For example; the Law of Moses, which included offering burnt sacrifices to the Lord. After the crusixion of Christ, that was done away with because Jesus was the ultimate sacrifice, the most perfect lamb, and no sacrifice could match up. So because one great thing happened, the law was changed. Do you understand? Quote:
H-D :pimp: |
Quote:
i understand fully what you are saying but i do not see the mormonism is a return to truth like luther, calvin and others were for their day. luther and his contempories were rebelling against the catholic church and how tradition had become more important than what the scriptures say. they did not add new doctrines like joseph smith so clearly did. furthermore the new testament instructs us to test all spirits and prophets. how is one supposed to test smith when we can't translate the language fully? it is impossible to verify the truth or otherwise of his sayings other than on blind faith. the bible never instructs blind faith and reasoning is certainly not excluded from faith and quite the opposite in fact. if smith was so sure of the truth of what he said he shouldn't have acted in the way he did. have a look at christ when he rebuked peter for cutting the ear off a soldier and how he had no fear before pilate or as the roman soliders spat on him and treated him like a dog. why do we need a secondary authority like the book of mormon when 2 timothy 3:16 saids that all scripture is useful for teaching, rebuking......and revelation instructs not to add or take away from the holy scriptures and this is added instruction? anyhow see ya round and have a good new years.....:) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
lol sorry you'll have to explain that last part to me! :confused: i have found jw's are very knowledgable but how they interept certain passages just baffles me. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2004 Steve Caponetto. All Rights Reserved.