CreedFeed Community |
Zealous moderator? What the heck...
Quote:
OK... so "clearify..." And when was "the first time?" :confused: What was the problem with my post? Is quoting an article all of a sudden taboo? What the heck Mulletman. Way to go, buddy... :mad: |
You posted quotes from the interview that alone sounded biased were taken out of context. Whether it was on purpose or accidental, those remarks would cause more harm then good. Once the fire dies down, you guys can speculate over whatever. Please do not place the blame on anyone until both parties have spoken.
|
Quote:
Tell me which quote I took out of context, my good man. The content of the interview/article was pretty much all against Stapp. Quote:
There was no "speculation" in my post. If you didn't notice, they were all quotes taken directly from the interview. Quote:
Quoting an article (that was already posted on the site) does harm? Help me understand this. Trem/Flip essentially placed blame on Stapp for the breakup. That's not wild speculation, that's right out of the interview. Have you not read it? Using your logic, the article should also be censored from creedfeed.com because it does not represent "both parties." To be consistent, you would also need to censor Mark if he comes on this board and repeats what he did in the MTV interview. If you are unwilling to censor the article, then kindly refrain from needlessly censoring my posts and overstepping your bounds. |
FYI: here is a copy of my wildly speculative post:
Some key quotes from the MTVNews interview/article I found interesting. What lead to Creed's dissolution Quote:
Who the 'quarrel' was with Quote:
Conflict during the Weathered Tour Quote:
On Scott's mindset Quote:
Quote:
The infamous Chicago concert Quote:
Tremonti's mindset Quote:
Plea for history Quote:
|
Velocity, we're all capable of reading the article in its entirety and drawing our own conclusions. We don't need selected quotes highlighted for our edification. State your opinion and move on. The whole post seemed to be bait, and thankfully, not many bit before your post was edited.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Heaven forbid anyone read selected quotes (taken in context) to highlight some interesting points made in an interview... 2) You say "state your opinion and move on." How is that possible when you delete my posts? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You stifle members and then try to rationalize it. Could ANYONE bring up the facts (as voiced by Mark/Flip) contained in that interview in ANY form? Answer me that and then jive it with the logic you used to repeatedly censor my posts. Just cram a sock in the guy's mouth, say "I don't think your post was good" and then "move on" as if nothing happened. I don't appreciate this at all. |
The reasons your posts were edited were given by the other mods. If you don't agree with them either let it go or post elsewhere. Rather than let rumors spread that have no bearing, we want to keep the discussions to a respectable level. Instead of discussing the article you simply posted individual quotes. Postint quotes from the article is fine, but follow up the quote with a discussion about it. Why did you post it. What is your feeling about it? Please understand that by pasting single quotes from the entire article can make your post appear to have a certain meaning one way or another. That is what we want to avoid here.
|
Quote:
Funny, the reason I didn't post any extra remarks was because I figured (from past experience) that the post would be censored due to "speculation." So you're telling me that if I post the same text with my opinions, it will not be censored by mods? |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I didn't delete your post, but I would have if I'd gotten to it first :D. |
Quote:
Quote:
By not censoring the post, you allow everyone to decide. By deleting the post, you decide for everyone. |
Well, I'm sorry you don't get it. I explained my reasons, you explained yours. This bickering is pointless.
|
Omg Revolution!!!!!1
|
I think what the mods are trying to say is that they don't mind if you state your opinion, but when you use your opinion in a post that is obviously pointing out the negatives in your quotes and then going into detail as to why is, when you get down to it, merely trolling.
It's one thing to make quotes and explain your opinion of them, it's another to do so in such a blatantly negative way. Perhaps if you posted it and stated your opinion in a less enflaming way you'd meet with better results from the mods. Just my 2 cents, take it for what it's worth. |
Rune pretty much summed up what I couldn't express in words for some reason. Thank you. That is exactly what I was trying to say in my original post.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2004 Steve Caponetto. All Rights Reserved.