CreedFeed Community

CreedFeed Community (http://www.creedfeed.com/community/index.php)
-   Chat-O-Rama (http://www.creedfeed.com/community/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Who to vote for.......... (http://www.creedfeed.com/community/showthread.php?t=5704)

marlsy 01-28-2004 07:38 PM

Who to vote for..........
 
Here is a website you can take a test on the issues for our Americans on what President your views match up with the most...... Click on Q&A and take the test.

http://www.presidentmatch.com/Main.jsp2?cp=main

RMadd 01-28-2004 11:13 PM

Oh, that's some beautiful stuff! 100% w/ George W. Bush!!!

SleeplessAngel 01-28-2004 11:37 PM

George Bush only got 58% on mine.

Higher_Desire 01-28-2004 11:45 PM

Here's my breakdown. It couldn't be more wrong:

1. Sharpton (100%)
2. Kerry (98%)
3. Liberman (96%)
4. Edwards (96%)
5. Kucinich (93%)
6. Bush (89%)
7. Clark (88%)
8. Dean (82%)

At least Dean got last place. I'm still definetly voting for George "Dubyah" Bush.


H-D :hypno:

Mulletman 01-28-2004 11:50 PM

Im voting for Bush as well.

If i had to chose from any the Dems, I'd go with Leiberman. He's the most conservative liberal there. So if anyone of you all are voting in the primaries... vote Jew!

archie bunker 01-28-2004 11:54 PM

cool
 
i'm BUSH all the way :)

SleeplessAngel 01-28-2004 11:56 PM

And here I was happy Bush didn't get 100% on that thing. I'm evil, I know.

JenRN 01-28-2004 11:56 PM

No mystery to you all about me......... BUSH!!!!!! :D

Dogstar 01-29-2004 12:17 AM

Well, the poll was right about one thing. Bush came in last for me...no surprise there...I only matched up with him 9 percent :laugh:

DangerousDan85 01-29-2004 12:20 AM

i wish Arnold could run for president

Steve 01-29-2004 12:27 AM

I had 83% for Bush and 100% for Kerry?!?!?! :wtf:

Bush has my vote.

JenRN 01-29-2004 12:28 AM

I just took the test 100% BUSH baby!

Then Kerry came in next at 82%

Dogstar 01-29-2004 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DangerousDan85
i wish Arnold could run for president

:roll: :roll:

RMadd 01-29-2004 12:40 AM

let's see, overall:
Bush=100%
Lieberman=50%
Edwards=50% (he was actually @ my school tonight... didn't see him, esp. w/ one of my ignorant roommates suggesting I do so "to learn something"... dumbass)
Clark=41%
Kerry=38%
Dean=37%
Sharpton=23%
Kucinich=20%
I hate Howard Dean, and am very happy he hasn't performed as well as he hoped (and am very happy that he's too stupid to remember proper campaigning etiquette, though facing him might make it easier for Bush. hmm....)
If I had to choose out of the Democraps, I'd take either Lieberman or Edwards, perhaps Kerry.

souldancer 01-29-2004 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DangerousDan85
i wish Arnold could run for president

Hey....watch for Our Terminator State President in 2008! He will pump all the rest up and out!
Actually, I have been open-minded and incredulous at the same time about this whole thing - I wish Arnold well (hell, we needed some major stirring-up), he seems sincere, has a Democratic wife and heck, my home town FINALLY got on the map! People used to think LA or San Fran was the capitol of Cal-E-Fornia.

As for my vote for President, don't they have a porn star, comedian, actor or some other non-politician running? ;)

souldancer 01-29-2004 12:58 AM

Broke down and took that test. No surprises.

Xterminator27 01-29-2004 01:58 AM

Heres the real election sheet

http://maddox.xmission.com/tictacs.html



I vote option #2

Xterminator27 01-29-2004 02:09 AM

This is what I got


1 Sharpton Score: 100%
2 Kucinich Score: 96%
3 Kerry Score: 87%
4 Clark Score: 84%
5 Dean Score: 79%
6 Lieberman Score: 78%
7 Edwards Score: 78%
8 Bush Score: 60%


Sharpton or Kucinich better win, for the worlds sake

Xterminator27 01-29-2004 02:15 AM

isnt this interesting
for the environment part, i matched all the presidents up and if you look, every single candidate strongly opposes destroying the world and environment, EXCEPT for bush, who is the only one out of 10 who wants to destroy the environment and end life on earth for all mankind.

whats that tell you?

souldancer 01-29-2004 02:18 AM

You're brave X! Well, since you posted yours...
On top were..Kucinich, Sharpton, Kerry
and the very bottom was Bush.

Xterminator27 01-29-2004 02:25 AM

i dont live in america,

but if i did id choose those things,
luckely 80% of the problems there are already fixed in canada

souldancer 01-29-2004 02:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xterminator27
i dont live in america,

but if i did id choose those things,
luckely 80% of the problems there are already fixed in canada

Oh, forgot you were an outsider (j/k)...I'd like a tic tac please!

WeatheredWoman 01-29-2004 10:14 AM

Lol!!! That whole president-thing on tv makes me laugh... what a circus! Entertainment it is...

Kerry 100%
Clark 93%
Bush 48%

Oh man... I can't stand Bush... Mr. War-president! Such an ego :pukey: and when he was elected it wasn't with a great majority :rolleyes:
He sure has build up a bad reputation in the whole wide world!

No hard feelings please! I live in a free, down to earth country :D

WeatheredWoman 01-29-2004 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xterminator27
Heres the real election sheet

http://maddox.xmission.com/tictacs.html



I vote option #2




I loooooooooved it X :thumbsup:

Higher_Desire 01-29-2004 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xterminator27
Heres the real election sheet

http://maddox.xmission.com/tictacs.html



I vote option #2


Ha! Yeah, I saw one just like that when Clinton was running for re-election. It was funnier with him.


H-D :hypno:

marlsy 01-29-2004 11:26 AM

well, Bush wasn't on top of mine either, Kerry was, but Bush WILL get my vote....... No surprise there!!! :D

RMadd 01-29-2004 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xterminator27
Heres the real election sheet

http://maddox.xmission.com/tictacs.html



I vote option #2


um, yeah. I guess only in Canada would anyone be so clever as to pit a candy breath-freshener against a person running for office.

RMadd 01-29-2004 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xterminator27
i dont live in america,

but if i did id choose those things,
luckely 80% of the problems there are already fixed in canada

Yeah, by not having much of an environment (is it really possible to destroy snow and ice other than by global warming, which is really just a part of the earth's natural cycle?). And it depends on your point-of-view on these things. I suppose it's great that Canada's economy, though strong, is still quite insignificant compared to the United States'. And, though I profess to not be well-versed in Canadian politics (please correct me if I'm wrong here), that you're possibly paying higher taxes so everyone gets health care, rather than allowing companies and businesses run by the people to provide? Of course, I guess you don't have to worry about many illegal and drug-trafficking American immigrants crossing the border every day. And because you're not a superpower, as the United States is, you need not worry as much as the U.S. about your country's role in global politics. So I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the vast majority of the problems that you allege are "fixed" in Canada, your little pansy-ass nation doesn't really have to worry about in the first place (in the very least, not to the extent to which the United States must).

Aimee 01-29-2004 11:53 AM

Marlsy, Thank you for posting this link. The most dangerous thing that the American public can do besides making uninformed decisions is remain apathetic and make no decision at all.

JulieCitySlicker 01-29-2004 11:53 AM

I'm voting for Bush regardless ;)

marlsy 01-29-2004 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aimee
Marlsy, Thank you for posting this link. The most dangerous thing that the American public can do besides making uninformed decisions is remain apathetic and make no decision at all.


Sure Aimee, and your right!!! :D

RMadd 01-29-2004 11:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aimee
Marlsy, Thank you for posting this link. The most dangerous thing that the American public can do besides making uninformed decisions is remain apathetic and make no decision at all.

Apathy is good. To clarify, IMO, it's bad for a country when people who are not well-informed on issues surrounding the election vote. Otherwise, you get people voting for a candidate strictly b/c of his looks. And while that does play a role in some people's choices, it must not take precedence over the issues. Perhaps one of the greatest reasons I am supporting Bush in this is because he is the only candidate to be opposed to both abortion and gay marriages (and all other types of unions). Plus, some Democraps want to raise taxes... not cool. And the list goes on...

RMadd 01-29-2004 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xterminator27
This is what I got


1 Sharpton Score: 100%
2 Kucinich Score: 96%
3 Kerry Score: 87%
4 Clark Score: 84%
5 Dean Score: 79%
6 Lieberman Score: 78%
7 Edwards Score: 78%
8 Bush Score: 60%

Sharpton or Kucinich better win, for the worlds sake


Oh, man, I feel bad for you. Al Sharpton @ 100%? Whew. I can't say there are many Americans who truly respect this man. Thank God he stands no chance whatsoever (not to be racist, but the fact of the matter is, unless it's Colin Powell, the US will not elect an African-American president in the next few years... and with Sharpton's crazy antics, he stands no chance). And Kucinich? Wow, can't say I've heard a whole lot about him. Your lineup is roughly backasswards from my own (other than that the Democraps scored well below any of those %s).

Xterminator27 01-29-2004 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BearFan
Yeah, by not having much of an environment (is it really possible to destroy snow and ice other than by global warming, which is really just a part of the earth's natural cycle?). And it depends on your point-of-view on these things. I suppose it's great that Canada's economy, though strong, is still quite insignificant compared to the United States'. And, though I profess to not be well-versed in Canadian politics (please correct me if I'm wrong here), that you're possibly paying higher taxes so everyone gets health care, rather than allowing companies and businesses run by the people to provide? Of course, I guess you don't have to worry about many illegal and drug-trafficking American immigrants crossing the border every day. And because you're not a superpower, as the United States is, you need not worry as much as the U.S. about your country's role in global politics. So I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the vast majority of the problems that you allege are "fixed" in Canada, your little pansy-ass nation doesn't really have to worry about in the first place (in the very least, not to the extent to which the United States must).



K, id rather pay 7% tax on everything then have to dish out $100,000 that i cant afford on my deseased liver. And id rather live in a country that has about 100 gun murders a year instead of 11,000. Not to mention"ghettos" "bad parts" and all that shit with gangsand muders NEVER happens here. Also we dont have the death penelty to innocent people who are conviceted are not killed. And yeha, global warming is a natural procces of teh Earth LOL. yup, pounding 1000 tonnes of Co2 into the atmosphere is Natural. And its good for our environment when the ice caps melt, kill off species, destroy the food chain, and end all life on earth. Perfectly natural.
Did I mention if you walk around in foren countires with an american flag, you get egged. where as if you had a canadian flag, people are nice to you and give you stuff.

Oh and i didnt make that Tick-tack page.
An American did, which shows how supported your government is. Plus what many people dont know is the USA is in depte by trillions of dollers, and if they took all the money they spent of promoting mass destruction and ending all life on earth, they could solve world hunger.

Dogstar 01-29-2004 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by souldancer
You're brave X! Well, since you posted yours...
On top were..Kucinich, Sharpton, Kerry
and the very bottom was Bush.

Hehehe, same here :D

Steve 01-29-2004 12:38 PM

Quote:

K, id rather pay 7% tax on everything then have to dish out $100,000 that i cant afford on my deseased liver.

That's what insurance is for.

Xterminator27 01-29-2004 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve
That's what insurance is for.


not everyone has insurance

RMadd 01-29-2004 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xterminator27
K, id rather pay 7% tax on everything then have to dish out $100,000 that i cant afford on my deseased liver. And id rather live in a country that has about 100 gun murders a year instead of 11,000. Not to mention"ghettos" "bad parts" and all that shit with gangsand muders NEVER happens here. Also we dont have the death penelty to innocent people who are conviceted are not killed. And yeha, global warming is a natural procces of teh Earth LOL. yup, pounding 1000 tonnes of Co2 into the atmosphere is Natural. And its good for our environment when the ice caps melt, kill off species, destroy the food chain, and end all life on earth. Perfectly natural.
Did I mention if you walk around in foren countires with an american flag, you get egged. where as if you had a canadian flag, people are nice to you and give you stuff.

Oh and i didnt make that Tick-tack page.
An American did, which shows how supported your government is. Plus what many people dont know is the USA is in depte by trillions of dollers, and if they took all the money they spent of promoting mass destruction and ending all life on earth, they could solve world hunger.

7% tax? That would be nice. Unfortunately, Democraps like higher taxes than Republicans. Plus, Canada doesn't have the amount of "stuff" to spend it on. Don't need a big army b/c Uncle Sam downstairs will protect ya.
So one of your major impressions of the US is of gangs and murderers? Can't say I'm overly worried about that. Perhaps in LA, Chicago, NYC, and some larger cities. But, believe it or not, there's life outside living in urban places. Gotta love suburbia.
Sure, people are improperly killed by the death penalty. But an even greater number are justly punished for murdering other human beings (call it "eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth")
And the global temperature does, in fact, run in cycles. Ever heard of an Ice Age? How 'bout the time before that when it was nice and toasty for a few thousand years, around the times dinosaurs roamed the earth? Then after the Ice Age, it got warmer again.
And I'll assume that "depte" is, in fact, "debt". But, really, what does the debt mean? We're in debt for a small portion of that sum to foreign (not "foren") nations, who also happen to owe us some money. The rest of the sum, we owe to ourselves. So what's the point in repaying that? Despite this seemingly atrocious figure, the United States' economy seems to be doing quite well (and, as we speak, is improving). The American dollar (or is it "doller"?) is far more stable than Canada's, a country with a significantly lesser debt.
I can't say I've been egged while walking around foreign (there's that dang-ol' word again!) countries. Granted, the extent of my travel has taken me to Mexico and Canada (incl. Horseshoe Falls, which is visited by a wide variety of races and ethnicities). And you drive around w/ American license plates. But I've never been taunted, sneered at, etc. If I may ask, to what foreign nations have you traveled?
I can guarantee you that, if the United States were to reduce its role in global politics, at first, all foreign nations would be thrilled. But then what after a few years of having no one to really lead the direction of the developed nations? Eh? This world would go to shit without an active, non-isolationist superpower.
And you really think that one measly website accurately represents how all Americans feel about our government? There are those that don't like it; there are those that love it. I've heard, quite often, if you don't like living here, move to Canada. From what you've told me, it would seem to make an excellent 2nd choice to the US.

RMadd 01-29-2004 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xterminator27
not everyone has insurance

You mean in Canada? I thought y'all had universal health care or some shit like that.

Aimee 01-29-2004 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BearFan
Apathy is good. To clarify, IMO, it's bad for a country when people who are not well-informed on issues surrounding the election vote. Otherwise, you get people voting for a candidate strictly b/c of his looks. And while that does play a role in some people's choices, it must not take precedence over the issues. Perhaps one of the greatest reasons I am supporting Bush in this is because he is the only candidate to be opposed to both abortion and gay marriages (and all other types of unions). Plus, some Democraps want to raise taxes... not cool. And the list goes on...


I guess it doesn't matter to you that the only republican on the primary list so far is George Bush? How's that for choice? X, I'm totally with your last posts too. We are foolish to believe that American opinion matters. Just look at all of the people who protested this war! Regardless of my opinion on the subject, Bush should have taken the majority into consideration, at least. But no, president's are only the puppets of the elite. We are a capitalistic society. In short, money talks and bullshit gets thrown in a gutter. This bothers me to no end.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2004 Steve Caponetto. All Rights Reserved.